Archive for July 25th, 2008

Small bomb. Not many dead.

Two days after my complaint that I’ve lost 30-odd followers (now restored) on Twitter, who were briefly denied finding out that I’d just had a latte or was busy so didn’t have time to say anything other than a brief update, the microblogging service once again shows its worth.

Earlier today a series of bombs went off in Bangalore in India. Not that you’d know from the major news sites, most of whom relegated it so far down their websites that, after the event broke, it was difficult to find anything about it.

But Twitter was alive with chatter about the event. I was tied up with work but had half an eye on my feed and every few minutes somebody was Tweeting about the explosion and, most commonly linking tothe feed of Mukund Mohan, a technology entrepreneur.

One of those was Daniel Bennett, who’s posted Mukand’s updates on his blog, along with some good analysis and issues surrounding both the Twittering and newsgathering implications.

Firstly, the journalism aspect. Yet again, Twitter was the place to be for breaking updates and, if you used Twitter search plus other social media search tools, as a journalist you could have a pretty good picture of what was happening out in Bangalore.

But what of the reliability of one person’s account. Daniel addresses this:

“This demonstrates how the facts in a breaking news situation are constantly being updated, changed and re-evaluated. Sceptics might wonder about the value of reporting these ‘facts’, before they have been confirmed.

But this is no different from the 24 hour news channels coverage of live news and many of the breaking news articles that appear on the web.”

His point is valid. Think of the London 7/7 bombings, for example. There were plenty of ‘facts’ or breaking news reported that day which turned out to be inaccurate.

It’s not hard to cross-reference what you’re picking up via forums, Tweets and blogs for breaking news. During my analysis of the Exeter bomb blast plenty of patterns began to emerge and if more than three people were saying similar things, there was a fair chance what they were saying was reasonably accurate (or as accurate as you can get in this kind of situations). It’s not hard to rinse your search results and work out who the best sources are. Journalistically, I don’t see this being a problem, although it won’t hurt to seek confirmation from other sources.

The other concern that was raised was Twitter hypes hysteria around smaller events (in this case the archtypal media story – small bomb: not many dead). 

Firstly, I’d imagine that if you’ve been caught up in an explosion, no matter how minor, and you’re Twittering, it’ll be a pretty big deal. We’re not all battle-hardened reporting veterans who can survey the carnage, file a sober report, then down out the sights we’ve seen with whiskey at the hotel bar.

Secondly, it’s useful for other local Twitterers. If I started seeing messages that the tubes were down in, say, West London due to an unspecified incident, Twitter would be a decent place to start to find out what was happening. The more serious the event (and bombs going off are still a pretty big deal), the more valuable this could be. It’s not hyperbolic to say that, in certain situations, Twitter could potentially save lives.

The microblogging site shouldn’t be taken in isolation, naturally, but once again it’s proved that when it comes to breaking news there’s nothing to beat it at the moment. Not even Sky News’s helicopter.

Why so serious?

Even without Heath Ledger’s untimely death, The Dark Knight would have attracted large amount of hype. And following large amounts of hype generally follows disappointment, especially with the superhero genre. Thankfully Christopher Nolan’s film doesn’t just live up to the hype and some, it raises the bar for the genre so high that all other films should just give up for the next couple of years. It’s that good.

The Dark Knight is over two hours but you don’t notice it. From the first set-piece with six paranoid goons carrying out a robbery for the unknown ‘Joker’ to the final climax, the film rattles through at a fantastic pace, but never losing track of the deep characterisation that’s become a feature of Nolan’s films.

The stunts are breath-taking (you can only wonder what they must have looked like on the IMAX) and the whole plot unravels with a plenty of twists and turns that drive the film to even darker depths. Were this a Bond film, oreven a one-off non-superhero action thriller it would be rightly hailed as one of the finest examples of its genre. That it features a man in a rubber-bat suit and another with pasty face paint shouldn’t lessen this on iota.

Then there’s Heath Ledger. It’s impossible not to mention the late actor’s performance. Ledger has completely immersed himself in the character to the point you can forget who the actor is and be completely taken in by this strangely compelling villain, who is a world away from Jack Nicholson’s enjoyable but hammy turn. Ledger’s Joker comes far closer to catching the sinister nature of the character in the graphic novels. than Nicholson ever does and is a fitting epitaph for an actor who, if he was still alive, would be one of the hottest properties in Hollywood off the back of it.

The biggest problem for Nolan is where does he go from here. He could easily spent the rest of his career in the Batman franchise, and that would be no bad thing, although you do wonder if he’ll ever be able to make a better Batman film than The Dark Knight.

But Nolan is also an interesting director even without the Batman films. Memento still stands out as a masterpiece, Insomnia was gripping and The Prestige was a better film than many gave credit. Nolan could literally do anything right now. He could never make another film. The Dark Knight is unlikely to be bettered in a long time.

In some respects, you’ve got to feel a bit of sympathy for all other superhero movies that follow The Dark knight. On the other hand, there have been so many God-awful adaptations (Elektra, Daredevil) that it makes you realise that it’s not hard to do a decent job.

No doubt there will be more to come. Most likely a second Iron Man film, although the first instalment left me distinctly underwhelmed and the film already felt like it was running out of steam by the end. The last Spiderman film was an utter mess but won’t stop another one being hurried out. Maybe somebody will think it a good idea to made another X-Men film (although I enjoyed these a lot more than Spiderman and thought they were a bit underrated. Yes, even X-Men 3). Every minor character will get an outing, I’d expect.

But there is still hope – and excitement for graphic novel fans. First up, Hellboy 2 from the ever-excellent Guillermo del Toro. The first film was a bit of a treat, with the director’s distinctive visual style playing well against a film that had more depth than your average comic book adaptation. Hellboy 2 looks like it’s going to be a solid sequel.

But that is nothing compared to the buzz surrounding The Watchmen. Either this film will rival The Dark Knight or prove such a crushing disappointment (and certainly fanboys and girls will be scrutinising this far more than either of Nolan’s Batman films) that it’ll sink like a stone.

But in the meantime, go and watch The Dark Knight. And if you’ve already seen it watch it again. And again. And again. It’s that good.

RSS What I’m Twittering about

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
July 2008

Throw letters together and send them to me

Yes, this is my name. And my email. Use it wisely or you're not getting a biscuit with your tea: garyllewellynandrews [at] gmail [dot] com